@article{oai:oiu.repo.nii.ac.jp:00000795,
 author = {中山, 実郎 and Jitsuro, Nakayama},
 issue = {3},
 journal = {国際研究論叢 : 大阪国際大学紀要, OIU journal of international studies},
 month = {Mar},
 note = {On 1 June 2015, the Supreme Court issued an important decision. This was on the interpretation of the Civil Code 468, paragraph 1. The content of this judgment deliberated on breaking of the defense. The Supreme Court made an important decision on the requirements for those who are subject to claims. Many lawyers have discussed this issue for a long time. Because I had a strong interest in this ruling, I studied a number of past decisions and theories relevant to this judgment., 2, P, 論文, Article},
 pages = {23--40},
 title = {債務者が異議をとどめないでした指名債権譲渡の承諾と譲受人の主観的要件},
 volume = {31},
 year = {2018},
 yomi = {ナカヤマ, ジツロウ}
}