{"created":"2023-06-20T13:50:36.981705+00:00","id":62,"links":{},"metadata":{"_buckets":{"deposit":"22394b01-6224-452c-b0e3-4ccdfd06dbb7"},"_deposit":{"created_by":11,"id":"62","owners":[11],"pid":{"revision_id":0,"type":"depid","value":"62"},"status":"published"},"_oai":{"id":"oai:oiu.repo.nii.ac.jp:00000062","sets":["1:4:14"]},"author_link":["3243"],"item_1_alternative_title_5":{"attribute_name":"論文名よみ","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_alternative_title":"キョジュウヨウ タテモノ ノ チンタイシャク ケイヤク ニ オケル シキビキ トクヤク ニ カンスル サイコウサイ ノ ハンダン ト カダイ"}]},"item_1_biblio_info_14":{"attribute_name":"書誌情報","attribute_value_mlt":[{"bibliographicIssueDates":{"bibliographicIssueDate":"2012-03-31","bibliographicIssueDateType":"Issued"},"bibliographicIssueNumber":"3","bibliographicPageEnd":"106","bibliographicPageStart":"89","bibliographicVolumeNumber":"25","bibliographic_titles":[{"bibliographic_title":"国際研究論叢 : 大阪国際大学紀要"},{"bibliographic_title":"OIU journal of international studies","bibliographic_titleLang":"en"}]}]},"item_1_creator_6":{"attribute_name":"著者名(日)","attribute_type":"creator","attribute_value_mlt":[{"creatorNames":[{"creatorName":"中山, 実郎"},{"creatorName":"ナカヤマ, ジツロウ","creatorNameLang":"ja-Kana"}],"nameIdentifiers":[{"nameIdentifier":"3243","nameIdentifierScheme":"WEKO"}]}]},"item_1_creator_7":{"attribute_name":"著者名よみ","attribute_type":"creator","attribute_value_mlt":[{"creatorNames":[{"creatorName":"ナカヤマ, ジツロウ"}],"nameIdentifiers":[{"nameIdentifier":"3243","nameIdentifierScheme":"WEKO"}]}]},"item_1_creator_8":{"attribute_name":"著者名(英)","attribute_type":"creator","attribute_value_mlt":[{"creatorNames":[{"creatorName":"Nakayama, Jitsuro","creatorNameLang":"en"}],"nameIdentifiers":[{"nameIdentifier":"3243","nameIdentifierScheme":"WEKO"}]}]},"item_1_description_1":{"attribute_name":"ページ属性","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_description":"P(論文)","subitem_description_type":"Other"}]},"item_1_description_12":{"attribute_name":"抄録(英)","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_description":"　This article studies a judgement of the Supreme Court. X entered into a contract to rent a room from Y and left guaranty money with him. Several years later, X terminated the contract and was requested by Y to pay the amount of money specified in the contract. As a result of the court ruling, X did not have to pay the full amount of the guaranty money that he had left with Y. The Supreme Court handed down the judgement that this was legal as a general rule in the case of such contracts. The contents of this interesting judgement are studied with reference to several past judgements and the opinions of legal experts.","subitem_description_type":"Other"}]},"item_1_other_language_4":{"attribute_name":"その他の言語","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_language":"A Case Study of a Supreme Court Judgement A deposit discount agreement in a residential building lease"}]},"item_1_source_id_13":{"attribute_name":"雑誌書誌ID","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_source_identifier":"AN10110523","subitem_source_identifier_type":"NCID"}]},"item_1_text_2":{"attribute_name":"記事種別(日)","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_text_value":"論文"}]},"item_1_text_3":{"attribute_name":"記事種別(英)","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_text_language":"en","subitem_text_value":"Article"}]},"item_files":{"attribute_name":"ファイル情報","attribute_type":"file","attribute_value_mlt":[{"accessrole":"open_date","date":[{"dateType":"Available","dateValue":"2013-01-30"}],"displaytype":"detail","filename":"25-3-089.pdf","filesize":[{"value":"816.0 kB"}],"format":"application/pdf","licensetype":"license_note","mimetype":"application/pdf","url":{"label":"25-3-089","url":"https://oiu.repo.nii.ac.jp/record/62/files/25-3-089.pdf"},"version_id":"e8af61dc-fdce-4e9c-807e-9db32b2db49f"}]},"item_keyword":{"attribute_name":"キーワード","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_subject":"敷引金の意義","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"通常損耗等補修費用の負担","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"敷引特約の成立と有効性","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"二重負担論","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"消費者契約法10条適合性","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"信義誠実の原則","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"制限解釈の撤廃","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"}]},"item_language":{"attribute_name":"言語","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_language":"jpn"}]},"item_resource_type":{"attribute_name":"資源タイプ","attribute_value_mlt":[{"resourcetype":"departmental bulletin paper","resourceuri":"http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501"}]},"item_title":"居住用建物の賃貸借契約における敷引特約に関する最高裁の判断と課題","item_titles":{"attribute_name":"タイトル","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_title":"居住用建物の賃貸借契約における敷引特約に関する最高裁の判断と課題"}]},"item_type_id":"1","owner":"11","path":["14"],"pubdate":{"attribute_name":"公開日","attribute_value":"2012-03-31"},"publish_date":"2012-03-31","publish_status":"0","recid":"62","relation_version_is_last":true,"title":["居住用建物の賃貸借契約における敷引特約に関する最高裁の判断と課題"],"weko_creator_id":"11","weko_shared_id":-1},"updated":"2023-06-20T14:07:53.166627+00:00"}