@article{oai:oiu.repo.nii.ac.jp:00000308,
 author = {柴嵜, 雅子 and シバサキ, マサコ and Shibasaki, Masako},
 issue = {1},
 journal = {国際研究論叢 : 大阪国際大学紀要, OIU journal of international studies},
 month = {Oct},
 note = {P(論文), The European Court of Human Rights as well as the British courts dismissed the euthanasia bid by Diane Pretty who was smitten with motor neurone disease and faced the prospect of a distressing death.  This paper first clarifies implications of two points characteristic of this case; she petitioned for a legal guarantee in advance that her husband, not a physician, should not be prosecuted for helping her to die.  Second, it discusses one of her claims that the law criminalizing assisted suicide discriminates against people with disabilities who need third party aid to end their own lives.  I will also examine the opposite view that euthanasia legislation would endanger the vulnerable.  Third, this article compares the Diane Pretty case with the concurrent case of another paralyzed woman, Miss B, who was legally entitled to terminate her life by switching off her ventilator.},
 pages = {21--30},
 title = {ダイアン・プリティ事件における倫理的問題},
 volume = {17},
 year = {2003},
 yomi = {シバサキ, マサコ}
}