@article{oai:oiu.repo.nii.ac.jp:00000152,
 author = {柴嵜, 雅子 and シバサキ, マサコ and Shibasaki, Masako},
 issue = {1},
 journal = {国際研究論叢 : 大阪国際大学紀要, OIU journal of international studies},
 month = {Oct},
 note = {P(論文), Despite the undeniable global move toward abolition or restriction of the deathpenalty, Japan has seen record high numbers of executions and death sentencing inthe past year. Even with arguments such as human rights abuse or possiblewrongful convictions, state killing opponents have often failed to convince thosefavoring capital punishment to change sides, because these harbor their ownarguments like deterrent effects, victims’ families seeking retribution, and social justice. This paper aims to clarify and examine the fundamental incompatibility ofabolitionists and retentionists focusing on three issues; first, whether fatalretaliation is a justifiable right of victims’ families or not; second, whether puttingmurderers to death restores fairness of society or not ; third, whether homicideoffenders are malicious monsters to be eliminated or human beings with ethicaldisabilities who need special care.},
 pages = {39--53},
 title = {死刑論議の諸前提},
 volume = {22},
 year = {2008},
 yomi = {シバサキ, マサコ}
}