@article{oai:oiu.repo.nii.ac.jp:00000104,
 author = {中山, 実郎 and ナカヤマ, ジツロウ and Nakayama, Jitsuro},
 issue = {3},
 journal = {国際研究論叢 : 大阪国際大学紀要, OIU journal of international studies},
 month = {Mar},
 note = {P(論文), This article studied the judgment of the Supreme Court. This judgment was judged about the first　case that a manager of the mortgaged property was opposed to a tenant about offset. This judgment attracts attention from many scholars and lawyers. This is an important theme which is given priority to when we compared a right to offset with a right to demand a rent. I examined past similar plural judgment and compared it with them and this judgment. This article clarified a result of the analysis. And I inspected the study of a scholar and the lawyer announced about this theme.},
 pages = {77--95},
 title = {担保不動産収益執行と賃料債権の相殺をめぐる問題},
 volume = {24},
 year = {2011},
 yomi = {ナカヤマ, ジツロウ}
}